The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous Research Paper

The remainder penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes - Research Paper Examplehment, most batch are afraid of death that is inflicted by the law hence, what is most fearful is likely to deter most criminals into engaging in heinous crimes. According to Hess and Drowns in their book wrote that death penalty is a better deterrent to violent youths (330). Administering death penalty will be effective in deterring murderers who might differently not been deterred through any other means when they friend face this punishment. This is because most of these murderers when given life sentence in place of death penalty, they go committing crimes in prison, such as murdering other prisoners or even prison wards therefore, death sentence is the only punishment that can be used to impede such criminals from committing crimes. Otherwise, they will not be discouraged into committing heinous crimes through any other means, and again because both convicted prisoners and p rison warders deserve protection from these criminals.In addition, it is important to enforce death penalty as a form of retribution even though death penalty does not prove to continue murderers from continuing the practice due to the threat of life imprisonment. On the contrary, the finality of death penalty creates fear amongst criminals and sparing the life of prospective victims by deterring those who hit them, is of more importance than preserving the life of a convicted murderer because of the possibility that executing them will not necessarily deter other murderers. Therefore, in addition, to using death penalty to prevent crime, it is not imposed for the main purpose of reattributing crimes, for instance, in case of murder it is unfair for the criminal to live. Putting threats and punishment is a prerequisite in the deterrence since it a one justification for violent crimes. Therefore, a criminal who commits heinous crime volunteers to assume the risks involved hence, the punishment suffered is voluntarily risked and it is unjust to the criminal not to be convicted and